Quote:
Originally Posted by Rygar
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Thank you so much Jaxon, I had looked for that FoH post but was unsuccessful. Very technical testing going on there. Hope that can be a case closed on the mana cap.
We have basically 2 numbers that were thrown out: 4,126 and 4,164 for the cap (not including buffs). I admit 4,164 seems a bit more technical, yet 4,126 was busted out in the dev thread.
So at least we have a range narrowed down... anyone have better figures than those?
|
This is where you lose me. You somehow still want your 4126 number in the convo just because it was posted by a complete rando in a "dev thread" as opposed to much more reasonable evidence pointing towards 4164.
It's these sorts of things that will cause people to oppose you initially instead of looking at your information with an open mind.
PS. Some people will always oppose you due to the salt levels coursing through their veins.