Quote:
Originally Posted by JurisDictum
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Deregulation doesn't lead to the states stepping up to regulate powerful multi-national corporations. It leads to them paying their workers less and hiring more illegal labor by pitting the stats against each other in a race to the bottom. The state of Oregon isn't strong enough to take on Google. We're practically on our knees begging for them to set up their environmentally questionable operation in the Dales.
Please google bless us with a few good tech and administrative jobs -- we'll suck your dick if you don't go over to Ohio or Washington or something.
And that's why even the fake Libertariansm Mick invented won't work. You need a big shot like the U.S. National Government to decide what the regulation on Google is going to be.
We just have to get smarter at overseeing this process as citizens.
|
you sound like a grade A cuck bucko
1. we dont need goverment to tell us how to live, only cucks like you do.
2. deregulation is not the only goal of the constatutionalist
the constitutionalist wants states to manage regulation, do what you want in california for all missisipi cares.
Its about deregulation of the FEDERAL goverment and empowering states to do what they want.
only a libcuck wants both the freedom to do whatever you want, RE sex, kill babies, drugs.. but also wants the federal goverment to tell you what to do.
Libertarian wants no federal regulation excpet military or central economy.
Then to let the states do whatever they want about anything else.