Here's my contribution to this thread and here's what I did. I figured the actual TS item link in alla wasn't the only place people would be discussing the proc so I found a list of every comment mentioning "Tranquil staff" and "stun" posted on alla
Procedure
Google:
site:
http://everquest.allakhazam.com +"tranquil staff" +stun
search for "stun" on each of the results (3 pages worth of Google results)
What I got was a list of a lot of monk usable weapons where people talked about the tranquil staff in the comments. Obviously comparing the DPS + Stun proc of TS to the weapon in question.
I'm going to list the links in order of what I think are the strongest support (hard evidence from Tranquil staff users) to the weakest (anecdotal evidence). I also filtered out any posts that looked like junk, or posters who seemed didn't actually own the staff and were just repeating what they'd heard (though it is interesting isn't it that "common" knowledge was that TS was a 1-12 second stun?).
I included some anecdotal accounts at the end because I think they lend credence to my memory (and others' memory here as well..) of the TS proc being an absolute monster. I remember monks stunning for ungodly periods of time with it and just wanted to verify that I wasn't remembering wrong. I don't think people would've been mentioning the proc so much if it wasn't so stellar
Data
Quote:
Posted @ Fri, Nov 29th 12:04 AM 2002
First off, as long as the skelly warlord pops at second bridge you don't have to kill his other PH's, so long as no one is killing his other PH's, so he'll spawn only at the second bridge IF he does spawn. Second, the staff doesn't show in his hand, nor does he "crush" you with it either. And as for the effect, it's 120 damage out-right, 1-12 second stun, and the stun will last either 1 tick(6 seconds) or 2 ticks(12 seconds), or just insta stun the mob. Also, it is unresistable, period, I've had this thing before and it's never been resisted ever, I used it on Naggy and it never resisted on him. I just looted one today (Turkey Day) and I should know. This has been the happiest Turkey Day ever for me (=
Iksar Monk, Morell-Thule
|
Quote:
Posted @ Thu, Sep 19th 10:13 PM 2002
T-staff procs 120 dd and a stun that last for 1-12 seconds. Stun duration is random (1-12 sec) but have yet to have it resisted.
|
Quote:
Posted: 2002-10-25 09:43:45
The DD part of the Proc always happens, the Stun though still not stun Unstunnable Mobs. The Consensus on Monkly Business seems to be that the Stun Lasts for 3 6 or 12 seconds, depending on the mob's level. If you Duel with it it tends to stun other toons for 12.
|
Quote:
Posted: 2002-05-02 20:56:03
The proc rate is very high unresistable , 120dd + 1 - 6 secs stun , but similar like common root series spells , you will recieve a spell fade message from mobs. But , why mobs always start to move or attack before the spell fade message appear? Is there any unshown effect on 100 blows?
|
Quote:
Posted: 2001-02-11 04:19:33
actuly i just got one tonight its a 120dd plus a random length stun from 1 to 5 or so seconds
Thand 54 mon innrouuk
|
Quote:
Posted: 2001-03-04 03:14:42
prolly more like a .0000001 to 5 sec stun, from experience its often insta taken off... BUT IT CANSTUN A GOD! WAHAHAHA
|
Quote:
Posted @ 2002-11-06 19:35:43
T-staff does have an Unresistable stun proc, I fight in Kael alot with my 57th monk and constantly get stun procs, Its very nice when I get a full 12 second stun, giants just sits there and gets beat up on without hitting ba
|
Quote:
Posted @ 2002-11-18 15:26:44
Not arguing the ratio of the CoS being superior, but I really don't think this weapon necessarily replaces a T-staff except in some situations. A 0-12 second unresistable stun is still incredible.
Would I trade my T-staff for the CoS? No. Would I add a CoS to my collection if I could? Hell yes [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] I would use the CoS in a normal xp group where I wanted to stand behind the MA and avoid agro at all costs. Same with raids. Soloing, I'll pull out the T-staff.
|
Quote:
Posted: 2002-12-05 08:28:19
Because the unresistable 120dd +1-10sec stun is invaulable when soloing or tanking with a shaman partner. I know, i've used a tstaff for a long time with my monk, i clear pog with a 57 monk and 60 shaman in under 8 hours (except the obvious mobs, ie, tunare, protectors, treah)
|
Quote:
2002-12-05 09:46:17
No you don't, you must have missed quite a big part of the zone, you simply don't have the DPS to do it, even if the mobs came at you one by one, you wouldn't, especially using a T-staff hich doesn't deal so much damage before triple attack ( the proc is indeed unvaluable though ).
|
He was responding to OP saying he cleared PoG in 8 hours for reference
These next few are from Ton Po's Bo Stick of Understanding which has the same proc as the TS.
Quote:
Posted @ 2005-06-13 15:29:18
The proc on the stick is one of THE best procs you could ever have. it does 120 UNRESISTABLE damage and its a stun longest ive had it for was like 6 seconds. This is your best friend for all mobs and it makes pking a breeze. Keep this staf
|
Quote:
Posted: 2003-03-12 17:33:40
Ok, i just had to say this, on Brell there is 1 maybe 2 on the server. If it were to sell i'd have to say it would fetch at least 450k considering the amount on the server. Cause there are 12 Scepters of Destruction selling for 390k a pop and if there is 1/6 that of these then expect to pay more than 400k. And BTW the proc is 150DD and 6 second stun on NPCs and 75DD 5 second stun in duels. just my 2cp
|
The only post mentioning 150DD? Maybe he made a mistake or was thinking of the wrong numbers, but his stun duration falls in line with other posters on this same item.
Quote:
Posted @ 2001-07-21 01:12:27
this is funny, yes the staff USED TO BE on traks drop table but not no more. RL friend of mine let me use it at lvl 52 i was hitting 220's my best hit was 231 its a uber weapon too bad it gone, the proc is a 120dd with a unresistable stun but lasts anywhere from half a sec to 9 secs. way up there someone made a list of the best monk weapons, dont forget the staff of battle 31/37 should be right under IFS. and yes CoF epic haste and chanter do stack had it all. max % haste you can have is 85% quit arguing and end it =D later
|
Quote:
Posted: 2001-06-03 06:49:14
Did eventually get the staff at 54, though. The proc didn't seem to trigger all that much, even with a big shammy dex buff, but the damage is really is insane. We had a 52 shaman slowing mobs and between his slows and the proc stun it wasn't uncommon for drolvarg bodyguards to only get about 10 hits in before they were pasted into the dust. And when you've hunted the BGs for awhile you'll know just how significant that is.
|
Conclusion
So it looks like a preponderance of the evidence suggests the stun is much higher than currently on p1999. I noted users mentioning 10 and more commonly 12 seconds as the upper end. A few data points suggest it falls within 5 or 6 max, some 9 max. Nowhere did I see consensus for the stun lasting less than 6 and the majority was higher than that in the 1-12 range.
Interesting to note that most of the 0-12 second range posters were 2001 and 2002. Ton Po's Bo Stick of Understanding posters who were saying 6 and 9 seconds were mostly 2003 or later.
I also noted there were some who said 5 second max (from Kanras's posts). In addition, there is the post from Kanras showing a Monkly Business poster saying the proc lasted a "usually more in the few seconds time frame if it happens at all." Of course we can't ignore this evidence, especially being that it's from 2001 and 2002. Also worth noting that one of those 5 second posters was someone who just had the staff for one day. I would just say that we have a longer list of supporting evidence that shows the proc being longer then those 3 posters say. A lot of anecdotal evidence suggesting it lasts longer as well. I am sure I can find more if I search using other methods but I'll do that later - this has consumed enough time for now.
I'll leave it up to Kanras to review and decide but please read through this and let's continue the discussion because I don't think the way it works now on p1999 is classic.
-Benceman