Quote:
Originally Posted by Tecmos Deception
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You're losing me.
1. What I did was logical.
2. I can't do what I did because it was a shortcut.
3. You decided to speculate up a more precise theory on less/no evidence anyways.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] |
It was logical for you to infer that your resist rate from your other spells might be similar, but you can't be sure unless you test those other spells without malaise. So you'll have to cast 194 envenomed breath without malaise first to see if you get the same 1/194 or if it's significantly different.
I used the word "speculate" properly, and coincidently stebbins anecdote seems to support it
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
cheers,
Astuce