Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuktus
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I still feel that forcing players to engage is not a reasonably demand. HTing SKs is a great example, as mentioned earilier. Its not the lvl 35 ones you need to worry about. A pair of lvl 50 SKs, guilded with Mr. /list 3 can invis down and make a fairly good attempt at not just KSing, but killing the mob before anyone has a chance to agro. Yes, spamming "target nearest" and auto attack is a thing, no doubt, I don't think it would be required. And even then, a small distraction at the wrong time? Ya done, go home, they got ya.
The other issue the folks are interested in is that you should be able to solo the mob if you /list for it. I disagree. Not all classes can solo well. Just because a warrior can't use mana stone does not mean they shouldn't be allowed to /list for it. While I do agree with folks saying everyone should help out, if the warrior fears for his life if he is the first to engage and everyone else is just gonna stand by and watch him die so they can move up the line, well, I wouldn't engage first either. Saying solo it or go home is pretty crazy to me. Honestly, can a crap geared warrior even solo EE at 50?
|
Have you personally experienced this situation ?
It's pretty awful. Requiring at least the #1 position player to take some responsibility towards their turn is the minimum that should be expected is my only point. People outright refusing at #1 is a joke and needs to be adjusted in the ruleset.