Quote:
Originally Posted by ZiggyTheMuss
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
30 seconds is a bit too much. I agree that #1 should be forced to participate though, I think 30 minutes would be more fair and have been saying this for a while.
Removing AFK checks for the rest of the people on the list sounds like a good idea at first, but then you have to realize that the lists would start getting obscenely long. I would say keep the AFK checks at #1 for the same intervals that it is at currently, but for the rest of the people on the list change it to once an hour or something perhaps. You still run the risk of missing out if you get moved to #1 without knowing and then miss an AFK check so there is some incentive for the people in #2 and #3 to start paying closer attention.
|
Good points. But if its once per hour then you end up sitting there for a long time if you forgot when the last one was out of fear of missing it. I think a static duration like 15 minutes with a 5 minute buffer to click it would be good. Then you cant just straight up afk (for fear of a long list), but you still have time to do stuff if you're not the #1 slot who's required to camp it.
Either way I see that maybe its not worth changing it now, except for the first rule.