Quote:
Originally Posted by Taluvill
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
quote on quote "ruleset"
|
Anyway..
Why haven't any of the IB watchdogs jumped on the fact that a necessary premise for their case is that we cheat? I mean, I know everything else is riddled with fallacies, lies, and misinformation, but come on. The spawn variance is not unfair if cheating is "possible;" it's only unfair if someone is cheating. The argument put forth relies heavily of the premise that IB hacks. And, sry, that's not true.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ektar
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Why haven't any of the IB watchdogs jumped on the fact that a necessary premise for their case is that we cheat?
|
And no, it's not because we cheat and they couldn't argue it.