Wow, I definitely have to break the gifs out for this: this is
exactly how we fix the wiki ZEMS!
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Now, to be fair, I'm not sure if your data is enough to give us statistical certainty (any stats buffs willing to weigh in?) ... but even if your number
is a
little off, it's bound to be
way more accurate than what we have (which was based on old unclassic EQEmu numbers, from what I understand).
In any case, you rock! And yes, please do edit the wiki. I'd just add either your research details, or maybe just a link to this thread (it's shorter), and I don't think you even need to add it to the page itself: if you just add it in your edit message it will be there on the history tab, which should be good enough if anyone ever questions where it came from.
Also, each zone (or at least most) has their ZEM listed on their zone page, so feel free to update the Najena page itself too.
One last note though: I know Dolalain submitted a bug with evidence for more classic ZEMs. It sounds like you didn't go out of your way to get these numbers, but still you might want to hold off on further research until the fruit of his research is patched in (because who knows: Najena or any other zone, might change when that happens?)