Quote:
Originally Posted by Duckwalk
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Have you considered that it might be in Riot/AG/Freedom's interest to have Kittens or other guilds bound by the same rules as they are? By denying Kittens and other raiding guilds the chance at any imput in this aren't you just guaranteeing a situation that incentivizes people / guilds being as disruptive as possible until the guides step in, ban everyone again, and THEN include them in negotiations?
Also, L-O-L at the insinsuation that Kittens are bad faith negotiatiors in this thing. Some people just live in an alternate reality I guess.
|
If they are making server rules you would be bound if you wanted or not. Player agreements you wouldn't be. They want server rules as a backup incase player agreements fail for whatever reason. I'm not saying if it's right or wrong but GM wants them to hash it , not like it's much choice.