Quote:
Originally Posted by Grumph
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
“Content” is an odd way to describe what Twitter allowed on their platform in this case: videos of a minor being sexually abused.
And maybe fast enough would have been removal after the victims first request.
Or maybe fast enough would have been removal after the victim’s lawyer submitted a formal request.
But yeah, waiting for The Department Of Homeland Secutiry to intercede probably wasn’t fast enough.
Some (like the presiding Judge for example) may even call it tacit agreement with the perpetrators (pedo-rapists and distributors of child porn, in this case)
|
I'm saying Twitter would be punished within the confines of the safe harbor laws, but you aren't getting unbanned.