Quote:
Originally Posted by Ooloo
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Oh cool, sometimes pregnancies abort themselves therefor it's okay for people to do it to perfectly healthy 3 month old developing baby humans. Or, well, actually for most of the left they want to be able to kill a 9 month old human baby on it's delivery date.
All you're doing is providing yet another red herring. Nobody is talking about naturally aborted pregnancies. We're talking about 99% of the rest, that are performed on otherwise perfectly healthy developing babies. Raped? Sure, get an abortion, but that's a tiny minority. We're talking about all the rest, try to stay focused. I think the brick wall you're gonna run into is that you really are just saying it's okay to murder an unborn baby, which is what you're doing. Use all the euphemisms you want.
|
Well, it's not aborted if it's not a pregnancy. It's just a fully viable fetus. According to my last biology professor approximately 50 % of fertilized embryos dont have enough time to divide into at least 64 cells before hitting g the uterus, so 50% into the toilet rate. And they are "viable babies" by your definition since we have the technology available at any fertility clinic to save it. Why dont you care about those babies and have women sifting their piss to rush them to a fertility clinic? Because only an idiot would think that's a baby.
And I dont know any liberal who proposes killing a 9 month old. I'll bet a hundred dollars right now you can't provide a peer reviewed medical study to support that stupid ass claim.