Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibartik
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I have a rumor idea, that the facebook whistleblower was a plant, by facebook, to strip social media platforms of section 230 of the communications decency act of 1996 that protects big platforms from being held liable based on what a user posts on their sites.
The reason that section exists is because companies cannot possibly afford to pay to monitor content like that..
Unless... they are as big as facebook.
If that is removed, then there will never be any competition for facebook in that arena again.
So hey, since both parties want it now I'd say: Buy at the dip!
Evidence/sources: Facebook could sue the pants off this woman legally very easily to at the very least shut her up... but they haven't filed one suit... because she's their girl, planted by them.
|
I mean she might be a plant, cause she's basically just saying "Hey you know how facebook censors things? Well, they should do it more".
Like, fuck you bitch go live in north korea, they censor everything there. You'll be in heaven.
"Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequence, hur hur hur!!" -something kim jong un would say