[Botten]

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I could see the video being admissible in his trial. However, right at the start he says I think one of them has a weapon. So if sounds like the context would be he would shoot a robber who he thinks has a weapon. Still is bad for his case, but could be argued as to save a life. For example, there just was an Asian 24yr old college grad killed in Chicago over his stuff. Someone demanded his stuff…he gave it over, shot to death right after. So shooting an armed robber could save a life, if that robber was in the act of threatening someone. It would be hard to argue this context because it isn’t explicitly stated in the video, although he does say he thinks one has a weapon

Well then I guess it was foreshadowing because one of the people he shot but didn’t kill did have a gun.