Quote:
Originally Posted by cd288
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Lol I agree. Like “oh wizards are much better at end game so you should totally take my crappy wizard in your group all the way from level 1 until then”
|
The whole point that is being argued is that he thinks mages without a pet are better than Wizard for a group. Throughout 1-48 and 50-60 the dpm difference is much more extreme than the ONE data point he purposely chose.
A mage, which has a pet, is almost always going to be the better pick. That's not where the dude went though.