Quote:
Originally Posted by titanshub
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yeah Baz, like I said in another post. Nothing is ever 100% provable. To set the bar so high its impossible to reach undermined the legitimacy of the server. This accusation isn't proof they cheated its evidence. Given the consequences to the server of allowing people to cheat as much as they want I think the bar that needs to be used is beyond a reasonable doubt. To most people, I think that line was crossed a long time ago. However, where you draw that line has major impacts on fairness to the individuals accused as well.
If the methodology and calculations used in this argument stand up I have a hard time understanding how someone could make an honest argument in favor of not punishing those who are accused because it seems unbelievable to the point of absurdity that they are not cheating. However, the real question is does OP's argument really hold water or did he make some mistakes. I think that should be demonstrateable. Go look at races further back, make a dataset and show the pack, not the outliers not conforming to the statistical distribution we expect from the human benchmark data.
|
I never made a claim that things are 100% provable.
I am simply pointing out that OP doesn't even have evidence approaching 80% provable, due to the technical issues related to online gaming.
I will admit OP's video is well produced, but that doesn't make his evidence good. There are a lot of videos online where someone's argument is well presented, and based on poor evidence.