Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
OP ignored basic computer science about data transfer over a network. So yes, he missed a big part in his analysis.
Please come back when you have the following:
1. Actual ping from all of the racers and the roller. This would first require proof the green bar at the top is accurate. If it isn't accurate, you would need to measure the ping of all players in a different manner.
2. Get the actual send/receive times for all of the racers and roller. Ping is round trip time, so it doesn't guarantee a 50/50 split between send and receive.
3. Determine how P99 prioritizes packets to be sent out. If message packets are given lower priority (and thus have more chance of being dropped), players could receive messages later than others due to this.
|
1. Ping time for stunningly is a decent approximation and based off of his actual ping. It could be demonstrated to be a wrong assertion but you have not done so. We don't need the ping of everyone you are just saying that to raise the burden of evidence beyond what is provided. It's not needed to make the analysis and missing it doesn't invalidate it.
2.we don't need to know the exact send receive time of every device you just don't seem to understand the technicals of the argument. 1/2 ping is a reasonable assumption. Ofc we don't have that knowledge and never will. If that was the level of information required to punish cheaters then no cheating would ever be able to be punished.
3. Packet prioritization delays on the server going to be negligible to the point of irrelevance. Packets will leave the server as fast as the server can give them to the network adapter and will leave the servers network adapter at wire speed. If there was a CPU or network backlog everyone playing would know it.
These are just excuses. We know when the data left the server. It's 1/2 the observers ping. Accounting for extraordinary circumstances still doesn't explain why the accused is consistently outside of the normal distribution of racers. It also doesn't explain the presense of so many world class 18 year old Olympian reaction times in a 20y/o elf sim. With that information and the ping of the racer we can infer very closely a best case reaction time of the human to produce the lowest time in relation to the observers recording.
You keep asking for perfect nobody can provide that. The bar is beyond reasonable doubt. If you have evidence the accusation is wrong provide it. I know you are not a bad guy. Can you not see how the actions of your guild mate might effect the rest of us who play here? Idc if stunningly wins 75% of the kael races, I'm in kittens. You seem to dismiss the reasonable claim on the grounds that you don't have to until there is a real claim. There can never be a claim that meets your threshold of evidence.
Like it or not the claim has been made. It could be disproved. I think most people are open to that possibility. This is a hard argument to make and there well could be an error or wrong assumption. However your time is better spent disproving what looks like a valid claim than trying to deny you need to defend from the accusation. We all play here and we are all damaged by cheaters. If he is innocent then it should be demonstrated via a rebuttal. So says everyone who plays here and isn't on the receiving end of these kael races.