[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Of course, which is a pro-life statement that I'm not sure you were intending to make.

But the moral culpability in this argument is on the part of the killer. Why did they kill the innocent life? Certainly doing so out of pure personal convenience, when it is a 3 or 5 or 8 month old healthy baby is the starting point though? Like, the most defenseless possible person?

If the innocent child of a terrorist gets killed by a US drone, the moral responsibility for that falls first *on the terrorist parent's actions*, unless it was some kind of mistake. In which case it would fall on the US for their error. I'm certainly not saying the US has never done horrible things sometimes amounting to warcrimes *IN WAR*. Duh.

But rob's weirdo comparison to abortion is just... too crazy not to rebutt

It's just hypocritical to support one but not the other.