Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustoo
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
At the end of the day what you're ultimately saying is "based on no evidence whatsoever, I want to give up the 2nd most important right in our "bill of rights" to an increasingly totalitarian government on the hopes that the possibility that losing this right MIGHT make us more safe, and that I am unready to admit that guns are the least significant contributor to the dangers of the decayed society I live in"
Regarding "we don't need guns" tell that to a 110lb woman who makes the mistake of existing while simultaneously needing to occasionally (god forbid, REGULARLY) walk home in the dark.
|
I never said "remove every gun from America"! On the contrary, what I keep repeating is that we need sensible gun laws, and this slavish fantasization of the 2nd amendment (we need automatic weapons in case the army comes for us!) is stopping that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustoo
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I have to ask, are you being intentionally dense or are you still honestly thinking that this point needs to be made?
If there was a reduction in bodies of water, there would be a reduction in drowning deaths.
If there was a reduction in guns, there would be a reduction in gun deaths.
This is a logical certainty, it requires no study, and is the exact same thing as 1 + 1 equals 2.
|
So if the logic is so simple, let's use it to save childrens lives.