Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The problem is you are basically trying to argue that because I didn't provide the evidence in the exact manner Troxx asked for, it is not valid. You have ZERO evidence to back up this claim.
|
I did not say that the "evidence" you provided is not valid, what I ACTUALLY said is that you have opted out of the direct comparison Troxx was interested in (and repeatedly asked you to participate in), which is a fact. You may be upset about it, it doesn't change the facts. You may also post whatever you wish, it will not change the facts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
We have to take all of Troxx's claims on faith. We have to assume his parses are in the location he claims, we have to assume his parser is undervaluing all DPS by 30% and not just the puller, etc. I am not sure why I am the bad guy here. I provided better, more concrete evidence than he did lol. He needs to prove his parser is undervaluing all DPS by 30%.
|
I did not call you a bad guy. The fact is you could do what Troxx did and as he (and others) repeatedly requested you to do, but for whatever reason you won't, therefore "The problem is you are basically" conceding.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The only concession here is from Troxx, because he admitted multiple times his data is incorrect, and still refuses to provide "correct" data. If that is true, he literally has no data.
The actual data so far:
|
Not only could you simply participate if you were not opting to concede by refusing to provide data in the format Troxx did, let's be clear that Troxx did not "admit his data is incorrect"; exactly what he HAS stated is visible on his post history in this thread, and equally visible are your posts including and thus exposing multiple misunderstandings/misrepresentations, pointless hypotheticals and raw math which (as has been pointed out to you by many others in this thread) does not translate into reality. Lastly, just as visible are the multiple replies to your posts, which as noted many times, you continue to either misunderstand or misinterpret, or move goalposts. I present the entirety of this thread as my evidence, and you may choose to post whatever you wish, it won't change any of these facts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
OP picked Shaman over Mage. Got it.
|
OP Picked Shaman over CLERIC. I present the above Quote as further evidence of you misunderstanding and/or misconstruing. Are you arguing from bad faith?