Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You can't have it both ways [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] You can't argue that a group wants to pick a Mage because of 30 DPS, but that same group would absolutely refuse to allow a Shaman to increase the group's overall DPS when fighting in an area like Sebilis or Velks, where it is easy and basically risk free for the Shaman to root/rot ahead of the party. That group doesn't care much about DPS if that is the case, so the argument for Mage also goes out the window. |
If you have a group of two enchanters, and two charms destroying mobs, why the hell would they want a shaman off to the side root rotting instead of just increasing the speed of the grind against single mobs? They wouldn't...
You've already lost this argument more than a hundred pages ago. Even if you're a troll, you realise even the illusion of your "victory" is null and void, right?