View Single Post
  #1536  
Old 09-03-2022, 11:39 AM
PlsNoBan PlsNoBan is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 815
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You already admitted two enchanters and a cleric don't need more DPS lol.
1 enchanter doesn't "NEED" more dps. More dps is always nice no matter how much you have. There's a difference between what's "needed" and what's nice. Just because something isn't required doesn't make it not good.


Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So you want a class that can open up more camps
Here we go with the Ixiblat bullshit again huh? Yeah totally worth it to pick an inferior 1-60 leveling option and something that isn't needed and brings less to the table in most areas of the game just so we can "open up" Ixiblat and maybe 1 or 2 other things AT BEST. Such a smart decision!


Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
further reduce RNG problems. Thats a Shaman. Thank you for agreeing with me.
A group with enc/enc/clr isn't having RNG issues they can't handle. I don't know what fairy tale land you live in but it's extremely easy to keep charms under control with multiple encs and a cleric backing them up. There is very little actual danger here. I have not agreed with you and the fact that you think I did makes me question your mental state moreso than we all already have been.
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors

These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings
Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member?
Reply With Quote