Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I do understand burden of proof just fine
|
It seems you do not. You're making a claim that everyone thus far unanimously disagrees with and goes against what is generally considered common sense. It's not up to US to prove the default stance. That's like if both of us walked outside and looked up and you said the sky is red and I disagreed and said it's blue. Would it then be my burden of proof to prove it's blue or yours to prove it's red? The burden of proof lies with the person making the claim. You attempted to do so but fell short of adequate proof with data that was acquired under different conditions than the ones being discussed. You may feel like the conditions don't matter and the data will be the same but I respectfully disagree and so does everyone else thus far. You can't just claim it'll be the same you have to prove it and you have not done so.