Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No. You do not understand.
|
No. You seemingly continue to ignore irrefutable facts, and/or you seemingly misunderstand or (intentionally or otherwise) are misconstruing your true understanding.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The debate is about Shaman DPS vs. Mage DPS.
|
In a high level, fast-paced killing DPS group hehe. This really isn't hard.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Both sides made a claim about DPS, and both sides provided evidence backing up the claim.
|
Your data is invalid because it is irrelevant, and this has already been stated to you multiple times by multiple people. Ignoring the facts will not make them go away hehe. I am also not sure why your posts would indicate that you think claiming that others have made claims (whether true or not) somehow changes the irrefutable fact that the only data you have provided is not relevant to the context of this discussion and to the challenge Troxx presented to you in it (as has been explained to you multiple times by multiple posters).
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
After the data was reviewed, a new claim was made that my data is invalid.
|
Your data is invalid because it is irrelevant, and this has already been stated to you multiple times by multiple people. Ignoring the facts will not make them go away hehe. I am also not sure why your posts would indicate that you think claiming that others have made claims (whether true or not) somehow changes the irrefutable fact that the only data you have provided is not relevant to the context of this discussion and to the challenge Troxx presented to you in it (as has been explained to you multiple times by multiple posters).
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That new claim needs evidence, or it remains an unfounded claim.
|
No. You seemingly continue to ignore irrefutable facts, and/or you seemingly misunderstand or (intentionally or otherwise) are misconstruing your true understanding.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You do not get to just keep claiming "your evidence is wrong" without proof. Otherwise it doesn't matter how much data the other side provides, you can just keep making that argument indefinitely.
|
No. You seemingly continue to ignore irrefutable facts, and/or you seemingly misunderstand or (intentionally or otherwise) are misconstruing your true understanding. You have simply provided irrelevant data as has been explained to you multiple times by multiple posters. No further evidence is required - the posts are self-evident hehe.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you say "your photo was photoshopped!", it is not up to the person who provided the photo to prove it is genuine. That is trying to prove a negative. It is up to the side making the claim that "the photo is photoshopped" to provide evidence showing this is the case.
|
No. You seemingly continue to ignore irrefutable facts, and/or you seemingly misunderstand or (intentionally or otherwise) are misconstruing your true understanding. You have provided irrelevant data as has been explained to you multiple times by multiple posters.
The post history is clear and viewable by all hehe.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]