Quote:
Originally Posted by PlsNoBan
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
He's now admitted that mage is better at royals and necro is better at fungi king. He's basically just clinging on to shaman being helpful for ixiblat and maybe like WW dragons? He's backed himself into a very tiny corner with his own words at this point. Would ANYBODY base their entire group makeup for 1-60 and beyond around what class makes more sense for Ixiblat? Or would you take a mage/necro that makes more sense in the vast majority of cases? I played actively on blue for YEARS and I think I killed Ixiblat like twice.
This thread really should be over. I know it won't end. But DSM literally backed himself into a tiny corner and the floor has fallen out beneath him. He's dangling by a thread and is going to continue to argue from there I'm sure.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I said all of this before, you just aren't reading, as usual. You simply have this strange straw man that I am obsessed with Shamans.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PlsNoBan
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Okay so we've established shaman has no place in this hypothetical best 4 man caster group outside of a niche mob or two. You keep bringing up Ixiblat which is one of very few situations where I think shaman might be helpful.
There ya have it boys and girls. If you want the best 4 man caster group for Ixiblat and maybe 1-2 other things put a shaman in there. For 1-60 and 95% of everything else at 60 pick something else.
End of thread.
|
Post history couldn't be clearer