Quote:
Originally Posted by cyxthryth
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
As I have already stated to you multiple times, this is intended to be a civil discussion - not an argument. Why are you (seemingly) trying to simply argue instead of engage in civil discussion by backing up your position with relevant, factual data or evidence? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Your post would seem to betray that you are aware that you have moved goalposts, because you are now attempting (disingenuously) to validate said goalpost-moving by stating that it is objectively true that the OP's post "is general" and that this somehow means "you are not moving the goalposts" by changing the basis of the discussion (from being about 4 priests/casters, to being about 4 priests/casters plus X amount of pocket Clerics, or other pocket classes). It is not objectively true that you are "not moving the goalposts" just because you and OP both agree that the OP's post "was general" and that that somehow means "you are not moving the goalposts". That is simply you - laughably - claiming you (and OP) are correct due to argumentum ad populum hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] This really isn't hard.
Please clarify what you mean by stating OP's post "was general"? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The problem is that your post would seem to indicate that you believe that others have given reason for you to believe that they believe "a pocket cleric is a difficult thing to use". It is not a difficult thing to use, and nobody has stated that it is - pocket clerics are simply objectively irrelevant to this discussion.
Remember: this thread is about a 4 caster/priest group. Speaking strictly mathematically, 4 =/= 5 hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This really isn't hard hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] |
Yup. He’s now clinging to the “this was general” comment after literally moving the goalposts multiple times creating very specific scenarios that he argued endlessly about. When he was proven wrong he created new scenarios. When he was proven wrong again he shifted to his current stance. It’s the funniest thing I’ve watched on these forums ever I think.
The only thing that might have been funnier is when eisley and santagar shat all over everyone in the course of supporting vanquish and then got kicked from the guild like a week later