Quote:
Originally Posted by jinxy12
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
sorry but i just feel you're wrong.
IMO, if someone drops out of the tournament, their enemy should auto advance, not switch the rules around..(btw if 5 teams total someone would have to auto advance anyway.)
same thing goes for changing rules on the fly, same thing goes for planning.
again, you say planning wasnt a problem but yet u say you didnt post the rules early (you did, even the ringer rule which was last added was a couple days before hand)
sign ups were like 24hrs? 48hrs before? not even?
if a huge effort went into these im super underwhelmed, if thats the case i can plan and host some (im not guilded and could care less who wins) events and not do any of that if this is the case.
feels like excuses for lack of planning and huge oversight just how bad changing the rules right before or mid event is.....
you want to have a test of tactics, have a test of tactics....but dont call this one and dont overlook how bad doing that stuff actually is (rule changing)
(not trying to be a dk, but if ur job is to put something put a number on it and you put a letter, im not going to tell you good job just because.
(again im not mad at you, and im thankful for something over nothing, but dont overlook the bad points of the something just because you made it, be better, accept criticism without it being personal)
|
While healthy criticism is appreciated, the manner in which it is given is of the utmost importance. There has been much debate and updates with our GM Events due to a variety of reasons. How you're choosing to address your thoughts about changes, while heart-felt, is becoming abrasive. If there are additional updates to this event, an announcement will be made. As always, attending the event is at your discretion especially if not in agreement with how we choose to execute our events.