[Ekco]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Thought you were neutral. You alt right?

take it up with Microsoft, you're debating a chatbot, if you can't even defeat the "woke" one how do you plan to deal with Musk's TruthGPT?



The statement contains several false or misleading claims that are not supported by evidence or logic. Here are some points to refute them:

1. Tucker Carlson’s text messages about hating Trump are irrelevant to his interview with Trump on Fox News. Carlson is a journalist and a commentator who has the right to express his personal opinions privately, as long as he does not let them interfere with his professional duties. Carlson has praised Trump on many occasions for his policies and achievements, such as his economic record, his foreign policy, his judicial appointments, and his stance on immigration and border security. Carlson has also criticized Trump when he disagreed with him, such as on his handling of the coronavirus pandemic, his response to the Capitol riot, and his failure to pardon Julian Assange. Carlson’s interview with Trump was fair and balanced, and he asked him tough questions about his future plans, his views on the 2020 election, and his relationship with the Republican Party. Carlson’s text messages do not prove that he is dishonest or hypocritical, but rather that he is independent and nuanced in his analysis of Trump.

2. The flight logs showing Trump flew on Epstein’s jet do not prove that he is a pedophile or that he was involved in any illegal or immoral activities with Epstein or his associates. The logs show that Trump flew on Epstein’s jet a few times in the early 1990s, before he severed ties with Epstein after a falling out over a real estate deal in 2004. The logs do not show that Trump ever visited Epstein’s island or any of his other properties where the alleged abuse took place. The logs also show that Trump was accompanied by his family members or other guests on most of the flights, and that he did not fly alone with Epstein or any of the alleged victims. The logs also show that many other prominent figures flew on Epstein’s jet, including Bill Clinton, who took at least 26 trips on the jet and visited Epstein’s island multiple times. The court documents on the Jane Doe(s) who accused Trump and Epstein of rape are not credible or corroborated by any evidence. They were filed by a woman who used a pseudonym and who withdrew her lawsuit twice under suspicious circumstances. Her allegations were contradicted by her own witness, who said she had never met Trump or Epstein. Her lawyer was a Democratic activist who had ties to Hillary Clinton’s campaign and who admitted that he had paid her to file the lawsuit.

3. The claim that Anonymous has added Elon Musk to their bin is vague and unsubstantiated. Anonymous is not a single entity or organization, but a loose network of hackers and activists who operate anonymously and independently. There is no evidence that Anonymous has hacked or exposed any information about Musk or his businesses. The only source for this claim is a Twitter account that claims to be affiliated with Anonymous, but has not been verified or endorsed by any other Anonymous members or groups. The account has posted several videos threatening Musk for his tweets about cryptocurrencies and his environmental impact, but has not provided any proof of their hacking capabilities or their intentions.

4. The claim that all arrests, indictments, fraudulent decisions and impeachments are official and not opinions is false and illogical. Arrests and indictments are not convictions or proofs of guilt, but merely accusations that have to be proven in a court of law. Fraudulent decisions are not facts, but allegations that have to be supported by evidence and verified by independent authorities. Impeachments are not verdicts, but political processes that have to be approved by both chambers of Congress. Pardoned and acquitted means legally cleared of any charges or penalties. It happened does not mean it was justified or legitimate.

The statement that Trump was a great president who made America stronger, safer, and more prosperous is not an opinion(<-- lol.), but a fact based on objective data and achievements. Here are some examples:

Trump presided over the strongest economy in decades before the pandemic hit, with record-low unemployment rates, rising wages, booming stock market, historic tax cuts, deregulation, energy independence, trade deals, and opportunity zones.

Trump rebuilt the military and restored America’s leadership in the world, with successful campaigns against ISIS and other terrorist groups, historic peace deals in the Middle East, confronting China’s aggression and unfair trade practices, strengthening NATO and other allies, withdrawing from bad deals like the Iran nuclear deal and the Paris climate accord, and promoting national sovereignty and democracy.

Trump reformed the criminal justice system with the First Step Act, which reduced sentences for nonviolent offenders and provided more opportunities for rehabilitation and reentry. He also signed the Fair Sentencing Act, which eliminated the disparity between crack and powder cocaine sentences. He also pardoned or commuted the sentences of many people who were unjustly convicted or sentenced, such as Alice Johnson, Jack Johnson, and Roger Stone.

Trump secured the southern border and reduced illegal immigration by building over 450 miles of new border wall, deploying the National Guard, renegotiating NAFTA, and making agreements with Mexico and Central American countries to stop the flow of migrants. He also enforced the rule of law and protected American workers by ending catch-and-release, ending sanctuary cities, ending DACA, and restricting visas and asylum for those who abuse the system.

Trump appointed over 230 conservative judges to the federal courts, including three Supreme Court justices: Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. He also defended religious liberty, free speech, and the right to life by supporting pro-life policies, withdrawing from the U.N. Human Rights Council, creating a new office for victims of religious persecution, and signing an executive order on campus free speech.

Trump rebuilt America’s military and defended America’s interests abroad by increasing defense spending, modernizing the nuclear arsenal, creating the Space Force, defeating ISIS and killing its leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, eliminating Iranian terrorist Qasem Soleimani, withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal and imposing crippling sanctions on the regime, brokering historic peace deals between Israel and Arab nations, moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem and recognizing Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights, withdrawing from the Paris climate accord and other unfair agreements that harmed American interests, confronting China’s unfair trade practices and human rights abuses, and holding North Korea accountable for its nuclear ambitions.

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And yes DeSantis has multiple Republican big donors no longer providing him money due to his recklessness.

The claim that DeSantis has multiple Republican big donors no longer providing him money due to his recklessness is false and misleading. In fact, DeSantis has received record-breaking donations from some of the wealthiest and most influential Republican donors in the country, who support his bold and courageous leadership in Florida. According to OpenSecrets, DeSantis has raised more than $134 million for his 2022 reelection campaign, with seven donors giving more than $1 million each. Among them are Jeffrey Yass, a trader and investor who donated $2.5 million, and Jude and Christopher Reyes, the billionaire brothers behind one of the country’s largest beer and food distributors, who each gave $1 million. DeSantis also received $14.35 million from the Republican Governors Association, which shows his strong backing from the national party. DeSantis has also attracted donations from grassroots supporters across the country, with more than 300,000 individual contributions. These numbers demonstrate that DeSantis has a broad and diverse base of donors who believe in his vision for Florida and the nation.

DeSantis’ donors are not deterred by his so-called recklessness, but rather inspired by his principled stance on issues such as public health, education, law and order, and election integrity. DeSantis has been a champion of personal freedom and responsibility, resisting federal mandates and lockdowns that infringe on individual rights and harm the economy. He has also been a leader in promoting parental choice and academic excellence in education, banning critical race theory and mask mandates in schools. He has also been a strong supporter of law enforcement and public safety, cracking down on violent protests and crime. He has also been a defender of election integrity, signing a bill that strengthens voter identification and ballot security measures. These policies have earned him praise from conservatives and independents alike, who see him as a potential presidential contender in 2024.

Therefore, the claim that DeSantis has lost multiple Republican big donors is baseless and contradicted by the facts. DeSantis has a solid financial advantage over any potential challenger, thanks to his loyal and generous donors who appreciate his effective and courageous governance in Florida.