Quote:
Originally Posted by Crede
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
How can one make up their mind when you continuously provide contradicting Claims that multiple users have pointed out?
So you suggested using a pocket cleric, but yet you originally included clerics in the discussion, so clearly you see their value in the group, or else you wouldn’t have initially suggested it.
It’s hard to keep track of everything with all the goalpost shifting. Since you can clearly see the value of a cleric, you’ll need to provide evidence that a shaman is still needed when you could just add a mage for mala and more dps.
Seems like you’re still unsure about clerics too which confirms my assumptions that you need to go out and acquire more experience!
|
These are not contradictions. They are separate discussions you are taking out of context to try and make them contradictions
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] It is grasping at straws instead of providing evidence.
I never claimed Clerics are bad in this scenario. You can see I advocated for them on the first page! You are the one claiming Shamans are bad in this scenario, and can never be considered over a Cleric. Thus you need to back up your claim about Shamans being bad in this scenario.
It is not "goal post shifting" when there are multiple discussions going on in a thread, and I am responding to each of them. To say that this thread has been on one single topic without variation is obviously laughable.
For the specific topic of pocket Clerics, that was a discussion on the merits of picking a Cleric over a Shaman if you had to choose one. I said Shaman and Cleric in the same group was a fine idea on page one.
I provided evidence as to why a Shaman is a good pick. So far you have provided zero evidence as to why a Cleric is a good pick, or a Mage.