Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Naethyn already pulled your pants down.
He posed that question. You admitted no content really needs knight spells.
Fun times.
Are we gonna morph this into another DSM thread?
Perhaps you should just schedule an appointment with your therapist to point out where, on the doll, the mean trolls touch you.
|
You have not been reading the thread if you think Naethyn "pulled my pants down". This is typical Troxx nonsense and lack of reading comprehension.
Naethyn made a logical mistake, because he only looked at the necessity for Warrior Discs and Knight Spells, while not looking at the necessity for Tank Mitigation and DPS. He ignored that to try and win the debate.
The problem is Tank Mitigation and Tank DPS are also unecessary for most content. This is why you see Enchanter/Cleric duos, Enchanter/Shaman/Monk trios, etc.
The only thing Naethyn showed was that tanks aren't necessary at all for most content, which is true.
When a group wants to use a tank, then you can compare which tanks are better for the job, by looking at their kit as a whole. Knight kits are better for most content, unless the content needs Warrior Discs. This is due to Warrior agro issues, and lack of utility on the Warrior's part. They can't fill multiple roles, which limits their usefulness in 2-4 player groups. DPS diminishing returns often limit the extra DPS a Warrior brings as well.