Quote:
Originally Posted by bcbrown
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm at a loss for words.
|
I am not sure why. If person A says Vanilla is better, and person B says Chocolate is better, you are at an impasse until one person provides evidence supporting their claim that Vanilla or Chocolate is better. Person A does not simply get to declare victory by stating Vanilla is better.
Here is some made up math that shows how Malo can be better. Let's say you get 5 charm breaks per hour. Cleric Stun has a 20% chance to be helpful, based on things like spell resistance and how quick the Cleric reacts. Lets say Malo reduces charm breaks by 2. In the end, Malo prevents 2 charm break disasters, while Cleric Stun only prevents 1.
You need to explain why you think Cleric Stun helps more, ideally with some evidence. Otherwise you just have an unsupported opinion.
You are not going to get away with simply saying "Clerics are better, moving on", while providing nothing of substance to back up your claims. If that was your entire plan for this debate, you can just stop wasting everybody's time. You already lost.