View Single Post
  #6  
Old 07-02-2024, 07:03 PM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vexenu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I submit the following videos as clear and indisputable evidence that Enchanter/Shaman is inferior to Enchanter/Cleric. In this first video, at 1:55, we find DSM grouped with two Enchanters in HS. Things take a turn for the worse when charm breaks unexpectedly, and contrary to DSM's insistence that a Shaman can easily help an Enchanter recover from a bad break, we see that DSM's Enchanter is at 3% health before he can even get a heal off, and is only saved because the other Enchanter landed a last second mez!




In contrast, I found the following video of a random Enchanter/Cleric duo in HS. At 57 minutes, we see the Enchanter suffer a very ill-timed charm break just as she is pulling, compounded by some repops. It's almost a worst case scenario, but as we can see, the Cleric not only has a stun and burst healing to help the Enchanter survive, but is able to leverage the power of CH to keep the golem pet alive through a very hairy situation. Needless to say, a Shaman would have been absolutely hopeless in this scenario.



This is not theorycraft or mere idle speculation, these are real gameplay videos, one of which features the very antagonist of this thread himself! And now, DSM, with such incontrovertible evidence before you, I demand that you concede.

lol


owned

Edit: and yeah watching that situation … you are a pretty shitty shaman. Rule number one of playing with a charming chanter is to keep them at full health. Rule 2 is to stop everything else you are doing and heal or help them immediately.

Your judgement and reaction times are shit
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Last edited by Troxx; 07-02-2024 at 07:08 PM..
Reply With Quote