Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Literally nobody thinks this is or should be the case but you. Why are you claiming people are in agreement when they aren’t? Is this the same delusional tactic you take when you thank people for conceding when no concession was given?
Has this thread broken your brain?
|
Not at all. You admitted you have no objective evidence to support the pocket character restriction.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
From the god damn title of this thread along with the first 100+ pages of the thread.
|
The title of the thread does not say "no pocket characters", nor does OP say it in the first 100+ pages.
This means you are subjectively interpreting the title, and have no objective evidence supporting the no pocket character restriction.
Thank you for admitting there is no actual pocket character restriction. You made it up. We are in agreement.
Moving forward, all arguments regarding a pocket character restriction are invalid.