[Troxx]

Page 266 and we are back to talking’ bout our pockets …

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A Shaman would NOT be able to rez & recover one of the Encs if they died, and the evidence betrays that you DO in fact realize this, because your post laughably tries to account for this by yet again moving goalposts. Remember, this is a discussion of a 4-man caster/priest group, which means "pocket clerics" have no place in this discussion and you bringing them up is wholly irrelevant (and disingenuous).

This really isn't hard hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Since you haven't been in the discussion, you missed the part where you can level a pocket cleric to CH a pet if you really want that in-between pulls. You only need a level 39 cleric for CH.

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So now our 4 man caster group has a pocket cleric to swap in between pulls to heal the pet …

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

#movethegoalposts

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

OP never said you couldn't have a pocket cleric. I am not sure why people keep thinking this is not a possible route to take. Between four people it would be trivial to level a cleric to 39. It is pretty common for people to make pocket clerics on P99.

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yup. He’s now clinging to the “this was general” comment after literally moving the goalposts multiple times creating very specific scenarios that he argued endlessly about. When he was proven wrong he created new scenarios. When he was proven wrong again he shifted to his current stance. It’s the funniest thing I’ve watched on these forums ever I think.

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Keep it up boys … 300 is on the horizon!

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by Chortles Snortles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So did DSM give up trying to prove shamans are good dps (within spitting distance of mages) in fast paced, high dps groups? Is this why we are now talking about kicking out the cleric in lieu of having a shaman … but saying “that’s ok because you can just have a pocket cleric and to log in for pet cheals, buffs and rezzes”?

Or did we just get on another stupid side tangent like when he stated warriors solo better than enchanters at lower levels (enchanters who can charm no less)?

I would have said this entire situation was unfathomable … but DSM proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that anything is possible if you do enough drugs.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

For those who need a refresher of the discussion, the current data is as follows.



DSM attempted to move the goalposts by bringing a 5th "pocket" character into his "arguments" (even though this is intended to be a civil discussion - not an argument) pertaining to the "Best 4 person all caster/priest group" discussion.

Of course - speaking strictly mathematically - 4=/=5, so it is unclear why DSM has attempted to bring this 5th character into the equation or why he believes doing so is not an example of moving goalposts - when it objectively is - hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

(Lol)

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why bring a "pocket cleric" into this?

How is not an admission of defeat right here?