Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
DSM’s rationale is clear. Shamans need pocket clerics so pocket clerics should be allowed even though everyone else disagrees with respect to this thought experiment.
Meanwhile clerics don’t need pocket shamans at all to be successful in all environments within the scope of this thought experiment.
Very sound logic.
|
Troxx continues to troll by strawmanning what I've said.
Troxx is ignoring Vaniki, where a lone Cleric would not work, and Malo/Shaman Slow/Torpor would help more than a second Cleric.
Troxx continues to dodge this post, which disproves his claim that pocket characters are not allowed in this thread, using his own logic:
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=5531
Troxx is also denying reality, as people make and use pocket characters regularly.