If I were you, I wouldn't be proud of bringing that up ... since it proves the opposite of what you're trying to prove.
When you referrred to the ring's mana savings, I initially assumed you were referring to the direct mana saving, ie. the invis mana it saves you. You claimed I assumed incorrectly:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
For context, he specified the mana saving wasn't for "invis mana", it was for nukes. Mana is mana, saving mana means you have more mana for any spell you want. I never claimed that the mana saved was exculsively used for invis.
|
But then BCBrown called you out:
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcbrown
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
When you say the goblin ring saves mana, exactly what are you saying? Are you talking about the mana savings from not having to cast the 30 mana IVA? Do you believe there any other mana savings from using a gobling ring?
|
Your response was:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you click Goblin Ring 10 times in an hour, you saved 300 mana by not casting spell invis for 30 mana each time. If you click it more, you get more savings.
Flowing Thought 1 gives you 600 mana per hour.
Both give you a few hundred mana per hour, and people like that. People pay 60k for that 600 mana per hour.
You are assuming you need Goblin Ring to save nuke mana. I disagree, and you haven't supplied any evidence showing you need Goblin Ring to save that nuke mana. This is referring to using instant invis to break charm later, which allows you to use a lower cost nuke.
|
... demonstrating that you
were in fact thinking of the only invis mana. This happened on page 22: even after
twenty-two pages, you still didn't understand the primary way the ring saves mana!
So no, that's not embarassing to me in the slightest ... except for the part when I gave you the benefit of the doubt, and apologized (when I in fact called you out correctly in the first place).