Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
... demonstrating that you were in fact thinking of the only invis mana. This happened on page 22: even after twenty-two pages, you still didn't understand the primary way the ring saves mana!
So no, that's not embarassing to me in the slightest ... except for the part when I gave you the benefit of the doubt and apologized, when I shouldn't have.
|
Yikes. The desparation here is honestly embarassing. For a person who claims to admit when they make a mistake, you are literally doing mental gymnastics here to try and save face.
This is your problem Loramin. You think your interpretation of someones words must be correct, and the person who wrote those words has no say on the matter. Unfortunately you think up really strange concepts that don't match people's words. This is why I say you have reading comprehension issues.
All I can say is you brought up "invis mana" as a term. I didn't. That is a concept you created and projected on to me.
If you think this quote implies you are only saving "invis mana":
Quote:
If you click Goblin Ring 10 times in an hour, you saved 300 mana by not casting spell invis for 30 mana each time. If you click it more, you get more savings.
Flowing Thought 1 gives you 600 mana per hour.
Both give you a few hundred mana per hour, and people like that. People pay 60k for that 600 mana per hour.
You are assuming you need Goblin Ring to save nuke mana. I disagree, and you haven't supplied any evidence showing you need Goblin Ring to save that nuke mana. This is referring to using instant invis to break charm later, which allows you to use a lower cost nuke.
|
That is further proof you can't read well.