Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It is just sad that after multiple years he still claims a static group of four players cannot log into a pocket cleric account. He has had a pocket cleric since 2014. If the static group of four players was a guild with just those four players, the pocket cleric would be a guid bot. All guilds use guild bots.
|
The official definition of static is "lacking in movement, action, or change, especially in a way viewed as undesirable or uninteresting".
Why would a static caster group of 4 care to make a change to log on a cleric when they could simply have them in their own group as clerics are more desirable than shamans to enchanters in every way possible.
Not only are you trying to change the definition of static, but you are just making this group even more inefficient by trying to continuously bring in a shaman. If that thread had said ideal 4 man group + pocket char, then you may be onto something there as you could probably just pocket the shaman for outside buffs if so desired(I think a pocket mage would still be preferred). But unfortunately for your sake it didn't, and you only continue to look more pathetic the more you spread lies about it.
I can't wait to see this new wiki update reflecting the proper feelings of the community and the dated one moved into a Kunark archive somewhere.