Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaggles
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Despite the norm, not every response to every thread has to be annoying.
Answer the question and move on. It’s becoming obvious few people are attempting to solve problems and prefer to posture with other blowhards.
Is the MCT a good aggro weapon in 2025? No
Is it a good Monk dps weapon in 2025? lol, no
See? Pretty easy and not nuanced at all. Legacy weapon sucks.
Unlike the BFG. Start a thread about that one.
|
In normal conversations, one person says something another disagrees with, and then they communicate until one changes their opinion, based on what they learned from the other ... or until they both agree to disagree.
But to DSM, both those outcomes are an anathema. Once he starts one of his many forum fights, he will do
everything he can to "win that fight" in his mind, no matter how incorrect his position is (including quite literally spamming the thread so that he always has the last word).
That means he NEVER listens to others or changes his opinion based on new information, and it also means he'll never settle for "we both agree to disagree" (because that would mean he didn't "win"). As a result, every thread where people have reasonable disagreements with DSM will always end this same way: DSM is almost robotic in how predictably he behaves.
(And of course,
many posters here have cherished positions that they argue over; the difference with DSM, and the reason he regularly creates 100+ page threads when no one else does, is that he is uniquely extreme in this regard, even for this forum.)