Quote:
Originally Posted by Ephirith
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The problem is that there is no point engaging with someone who has a very poor capacity for logic themselves. Your ability to coherently progress from premises to conclusions across multiple variables is pitiful and embarrassing; your "arguments" are rhetoric disguised as reasoning.
It should be a clue for you that almost everyone who engages with you eventually realizes this; in thread after thread, you develop this reputation. It took me two years and being on a different account that didn't have you on ignore to make this mistake again.
|
Your dishonestly about my posts and your clear bias are the biggest clue here.
People can read the posts you provided and see your analysis of my posts and positions are incorrect.
If you want to take the easy path and use the ad populum falllacy, I can't stop you.
"The opinion of 10,000 men is of no value if none of them know anything about the subject." - Marcus Aurelius
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ephirith
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What they didn't teach you in your undergrad writing class is that appeal to authority isn't a fallacy when the conduct of your argument is generating such a negative consensus about you that it's undermining your ability to effectively engage with the community. It's like a man waving his dick at traffic and chastising all the honking cars for honking instead of using 'logic'.
|
Facts, math, logic, and in-game evidence trump authority every time. A person can level all classes to 60, and they would still be wrong if they said something factually incorrect.
You are also acting quite poorly with the insults and lies. Perhaps fix yourself before trying to fix others.