Quote:
Originally Posted by Macken
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Dear Nub,
If the object of the game is to kill or be killed, then what exactly are you going to be held accountable for?
Are you suggesting i should try and kill someone irl and try to be unaccountable to it, as proof you deserve GM help to pvp?
Except for trains-- if it's in the game, it's in the game.
What you want is a referee to save you.
|
PvP is our agenda, yes. The object of the game, though? That depends on the player. The purpose of the server is to have PvP, something completely ignored and ancillary to what Sony had intended this game to be for. Obviously there are areas that were neglected and able to be used to fuck someone. So yeah, other than omitting from your memory that I said I could hang on any server with any rules, I do think GM's should hold people accountable for things on a game that weren't intended to be used as what most of you so eloquently call "tactics."
You just want the server up and to be left alone to do whatever you want, and so do I. But training is only a part of EQ in your memory because nobody gave two shits about it. When people were banned for it, I don't remember anyone caring. I have no problem with GM's banning for it. I think you think they'll go down a slippery slope and start making assumptions about who or what is training. GM's locking characters on an inference isn't what we're talking about though. Intervention for me is defined after the fact. I'd rather be trained, the night of events be over, and then have whoever trained on purpose banned or suspended.
I'm sure the devs have already realized that you make empty claims and don't expalin yourself, though. So whatevs. I imagine there will be GM's. Your case is weak.