Quote:
Originally Posted by Zereh
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Of course you see no bias; every decision rolls out in your favor. =)
Why should a raider's experience in P99 be defined by whether they chose to be in your guild or not? You're not special, you get special treatment. That's the only distinction between you and the rest of us.
|
In fact, none of that is true. I am not and never have been a member of Transatlantic Rampage, Inglorious Basterds, or any related entity. I've never even apped, and given the fact that I play about 12 hours a week, I don't think I'm real high on the priority list. For as much as you believe TMO is the victim of TR favoritism, the favoritism displayed toward end-game raiders -- both TR and TMO -- via un-Classic, unreasonably large variances is vastly more obvious than any inter-guild preferences. GMs were so concerned with preventing the "hardcore" dolts from poopsocking and making a mess of things that they instituted variances so large that no non-hardcore raid guild could possibly compete on a mob-to-mob basis. So I am part of a totally different favoritism argument. I have no dog in the TR-TMO fight. Just giving an objective opinion of why TR seems to benefit from so much favoritism. It's not favoritism, they just provide evidence for all their points. AND, more importantly, they pick their battles better. When they don't have proof or when they're demonstrably wrong, they shut up and hope it goes away, which is the smart way to handle things.