Quote:
Originally Posted by Biffins
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's like the ancient aliens guy seeing a flower carving in an Egyptian tomb and interpreting it as a lightbulb.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSparkle001
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You're jumping to a conclusion and basing your interpretation on that.
|
Second guy - you're accusing first guy of what ancient aliens does. You shouldn't work to debunk your own methodology! First guy is exactly right.
In the intro to the video posted at end of last page, the narrator speculates about how aliens could have provided ancient people with technology. Then he asks "what if we could find...
THE EVIDENCE?"
That's not a predictive hypothesis. You don't form your conclusion first and then search backward for vague evidence - that isn't valid science or logic. It's just a tinfoil hat TV show, but the methodology is so flawed that I can't find get any enjoyment out of it (especially when I realize there are people, like quoted, who lap this shit up like it's a thrilling scientific hypothesis).