Quote:
Originally Posted by Uthgaard
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
An assumed implication does not mean it's the correct context. Being black, gay, female or jewish does not exempt a person from all personal criticisms. You are doing a fantastic job of making my point for me however: That the overly sensitive will attempt to redefine valid criticisms and turn them into hate speech.
No one would call those statements anything but retarded, when you swap in Bill Clinton. But they're not. They're about King, and since he was black, they must be racially motivated.
|
Uthgaard I know it's impossible for you to admit that you're wrong, but in this case you are being so obviously fucking retarded that even you should see why. It's not the fact that he said something bad about a black man, or even that he said something untrue about a black man (that King was a communist). It's the fact that it's Darwoth who's the one saying it that implies the racial motivation. When someone calls Africans savages, says things like this...:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Darwoth
i generally do not need to say anything to make a "black man" look bad as they do it for themselves, ...
|
...and has a curious habit of making up lies about well-respected black people/black organizations, anyone can put two and two together and realize what the motivation behind his criticisms are. Also, keep in mind he throws around the word communist like it's punctuation - he even called me, Nelson Mandela, and Obama communists - so you can fathom that it's probably not a legitimate, well-reasoned criticism when a racist like Darwoth calls a black man a communist. He's doing it propagate his racist views. Since you're illiterate and have no idea who the fuck Darwoth is, please stop posting in this thread.