Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDudeAbides
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You mean like people remembering shit from 4 years previous and posting about it on message boards? That's "absurdly unreliable"? .
|
Yes, it is. Unless you wanna dispute peer-reviewed science.
When a bunch of people come together with the same memory, like those saying you could bind in fear, it is more reliable. But a lone Siinge-esque retard arguing against 8 people and 15 posts from 2000, using only memory as evidence, is the definition of unreliable.
You've gone off the deepend. Didn't you quit like over a month ago? Why do you still care what happens? It's pretty pathetic