Quote:
Originally Posted by Swish
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don't get it, Sirken responds to:-
...which is probably enough time to get the majority of a guild to a desired location if not buffed if they're quick about it. I hate to say it but he's right, variance should stay as it is for the sake of the smaller guilds.
|
You know small guilds know how to prepare for repops too right?
edit: to be fair to Fountree, I'm sure he's not lying when he says they purposely didn't race us for Inny. But that doesn't mean we would have been beaten to it, or if we would have, that this time wasn't an exception. We've historically done well on server repops, as have all the other small guilds I think, and it's not just because the "big guilds" were generous, it's because they were overstretched and couldn't feasibly get every raid mob when they all spawned simultaneously. Whether they backed off of competing for Inny or not is a red herring.
edit2: again, I don't want to sound rude or ungrateful! Just trying to stay on topic and say why simultaneous repops are better than no repops.
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior
Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis