View Single Post
  #9  
Old 11-12-2012, 07:33 PM
Tanthallas Tanthallas is offline
Fire Giant

Tanthallas's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 577
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eccezan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
this.

Tanthallas, There have been countless rulings where DT removes person from FTE list, why it left the DT'd person on the FTE list here is the real question.

Your argument might be given more validity if there was ANY other FE on the aggro list at all to support any claim to engage/pull to anywhere in the zone.

Unfortunately, you are left with nothing but a poor attempt at an FTE snipe ending up in a DT in full view of a GM. Lets see some more rules lawyer attempts tho!

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
How fucking moronic can you get.

DT removes person from FTE list if the mob resets, of course. The entire basis of this conversation is that the LOGS traditionally used show that CT was NOT reset between when Scorchin pulled and when TMO engaged. This is not an instance of kiting or delaying an engage. Hence Scorchin has FTE - given a raid force which was present - and TMO simply bum rushed CT and killed him regardless.

IF FTE shout was in place, this would be a CLEAR CUT FTE and TMO WOULD NOT HAVE engaged. That is the problem here.