A judge can require, as condition to the person's release, an individual follow certain conditions. Most the time, these conditions include no illegal drugs, excessive alcohol, no contact with alleged victim or witnesses, and no possessing firearms.
Does this mean that the judge is overstepping their authority and infringing on the rights of the accused. Of course not, the accused has every right not to accept and spend time in jail waiting trial. This is in no way out of the ordinary considering this negroid's political affiliations.
Let's look at the definition of anarchist.
an·ar·chist [an-er-kist]
noun
1.
a person who advocates or believes in anarchy or anarchism.
2.
a person who seeks to overturn by violence all constituted forms and institutions of society and government, with no purpose of establishing any other system of order in the place of that destroyed.
3.
a person who promotes disorder or excites revolt against any established rule, law, or custom.
Obviously this negroid is in favor of the violent overthrow of the U.S. Government. This judge should not have granted bail. Regardless since he did, he is well within his rights to restrict his communication to ANYONE he sees fit, until the trial is concluded. If he's found not guilty, he can be free to resume any association he feels he wants to.
|