Quote:
Originally Posted by derpcake2
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What is the majority of p1999 based on?
|
A best guess based on limited, flawed evidence and what feels right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by derpcake2
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Do you think it is realistic to have to defend every aspect of p1999 against factless posts that suggest things change?
|
Firsthand experience ("Feelz") is very flawed evidence, but as Lionel Hutz pathetically expresses "Conjecture and hearsay are kinds of evidence". If there is not enough hard evidence to swing an argument either way, but one side can make a more convincing 'feelz' argument and a dev is willing to try out that suggestion then I think that is fair. If the suggestion ends up feeling further from classic then make the 'factless' argument and revert.