Quote:
Originally Posted by kjs86z
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You're right. People just tend to have negativity bias.
The less data you have, the more it will swing (sorry, bad pun) one way or the other.
You need a really large data set to show people that hits and misses wind up being the same.
This whole dual wield vs. 2HB thing is tough to look at without a vacuum to test in.
|
My stupid lizard brain thinks: "well isn't each fight a small data set, so therefore the 1hblunt misses would be less impactful than the 2h blunt ones making it superior for each, of many, of these small data sets?"
Can someone explain to me why this is wrong?