View Single Post
  #107  
Old 02-05-2023, 04:52 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 6,156
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ya.dingus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Are you serious right now? You've literally posted the code backing up the 5% melee interruption rate the original warrior guide had cited.

Why would I rehash something that others took a look at and said *yeah that looks right*.

You truly are the cd288 of the thread.

All that copium, and he still can't cope with losing the argument.
Again, you read it wrong, and are not taking into account spell cast times. It isn't a "5% interruption rate". He was saying 2 seconds is 5% of 40 seconds lol. The interruption rate is:

8/10 secondary attacks are bashes
4/10 bashes hit
2/10 bashes stun.

So you have a 20% chance of being stunned every time a secondary attack is triggered. That is why it ends up being 1 stun per 40 seconds on average.

When you are casting a spell, you will lose more time when you get interrupted half way through. You will lose 6 seconds if you get stunned 4 seconds into casting Malo, for example.

You are simply incorrect when you say a resisted stun will always interrupt the spell anyway. There is no evidence of this in the EQEMU source code, or evidence I can find from P99 devs talking about FSI. The P99 developers aren't changing all the EQEMU code just for fun. They only make changes when they need to.
__________________
Reply With Quote